Reality Distortion through Media Censure

Most days, I think the gender political nonsense of Seattle is mostly a result of ignorance.

But, sometimes, it is hard not to think of it as an orchestrated conspiracy, with the local media in on the act.

Notice that today there are two articles in the Seattle Times about women. One woman was definitely involved in a crime. The other is acting very suspiciously like she was involved in a horrible crime. The Seattle Times allows readers to comment on most articles, but not on these two.

The first case involves Holly Crahay, who got into a close quarters gun battle with police. Her excuse? She was mentally ill. That's the usual excuse the local media resorts to when a woman is so outwardly violent.

Even more egregious is the case of Julia Biryukova. She says she left her young son in the car to go get gasoline because she ran out of gas, even though police found that her car had plenty of gas in it. Her son went missing about the same time.

Look deeper and you find that this case explodes every gender politically inspired stereotype of men, fathers, and mothers. It exposes the fraud of family courts and the misuse of domestic violence allegations. The father is now left in the dark during a divorce proceeding, charged with domestic violence and with a no-contact order slapped on him. Even now that the mother is a suspect, local authorities decided to put the remaining daughter of the estranged couple into foster care instead of into the care of her father. No one is allow to ask why this is. Or to point out that if the father had not been pushed out of the life of his son, his son might well be safe right now (let's hope he is still alive!).

Reverse the roles, and the Seattle Times would have no problem with the hundreds of comments that would result, with people calling for the man's head. In this case, the Seattle Times does not want to allow anyone to comment and thus publicize the degree to which people are sick and tired of local authorities treating violent women, especially mothers, with kid gloves.

There's more! Click to read

Tom Ball

It has been a while since I have posted. The days in a productive person's life sometimes leave little room for other activities.

But I am compelled to post in honor of Tom Bell. He fought the good fight. His actions were in the end extreme but he harmed no one. His analysis of the system that destroyed him is accurate. He has left behind a testament to the beast created within our legal institutions.

To read of his actions, go here: http://www.thedailyholden.com/Articles-c-2011-06-17-78443.113122-Holden-man-sets-himself-ablaze-in-front-of-New-Hampshire-Courthouse.html

To read his testament, go here: http://www.sentinelsource.com/news/local/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/article_cd181c8e-983b-11e0-a559-001cc4c03286.html#

I look forward to the day when we no longer need people like Tom Ball on on the front lines of this fight.

There's more! Click to read

Why do We Call Seattle Silly?

Here is a great example!

A lucky entrepreneur that lives outside Seattle has benefited from another of Mayor Nickels' follies, getting Seattle's $5 million dollar automatic toilets for $12,500 after they proved to be havens for drug dealers and prostitutes.

There's more! Click to read

Best to Treat Seattle Women Like Children?

"Disappointment, defined as the gap between expectation and reality, is an immutable part of life. True adults — those who are mentally and emotionally mature — accept, manage, and move past disappointments, and they don't expect others to prevent them.

Children, on the other hand, whether 5 or 35, do not and cannot deal with disappointment. Despite all the talk about feminism and equality, Americans, via outmoded chivalry and unconstitutional reproduction, child-custody, rape, and domestic-violence laws, keep women in perpetual childhood. Yes, American women have grown accustomed to being spared risk, pain, and disappointment."

Read more of this excellent piece by Marc H. Rudov.

There's more! Click to read

Another Example of Silly Seattle Government

Just another post in the on-going chronicle of how silly Seattle and especially its city government truly are. I can't really do this article justice in the Seattle Times about how Mayor Nickels decided NOT to clear the roads during this week of snow and freeze-down. So, just read it.

Thousands of people were put at risk. The city shut down during the week before Christmas. Retail shops were empty. Offices were empty. A charter bus full of kids almost slid down a hill and fell over 50 feet onto I-5.

For what? Because supposedly salt on the roads might hurt the fish. But the fish live in the Puget Sound, which is salt water. Meanwhile, "environmentalists" debate whether sand or salt are worse for the environment.

The really fun thing about all of this is that, apparently, as soon as Nickels became aware that the Seattle Time would have an article about the this lunacy, he had the roads cleared. Last night, all of the roads in Seattle were a snowy, icy mess. This morning, the Seattle Times article came out about Nickels decision to not clear the streets. Today by mid-afternoon, downtown streets were almost completely clear of snow and ice. No, it did not warm up. Think it was just a coincidence that the city swung into action?

Just more of the illogical religion of environmentalism.

There's more! Click to read

The Coming Obama Hyper-Inflation

Yes, it is true that we are currently in the Obama Bear Market and in the middle of a recession, so it might be hard to believe the title of this post. But hyper-inflation is coming. Be prepared.

First, let's talk about the Obama Bear Market. The usual story (from the media, from the Obamiacs, the various leftists) is that Bush caused the market melt-down. You know - deregulation, free markets, and so on, are to blame. Well, the story of how we got into this mess has been told many times, but the media mavens that have the ability to hammer falsehoods into the reticular activators of the mostly mindless public refuse to repeat the actual history enough times so that a large number of people have heard it the required six times to absorb it. The media is just too busy with the work of drumming the wonders of the messiah into our heads.

But, anyone who reads this blog is smart enough to have heard the story... and remembered it. This mess is the result of the real estate bubble. The real estate bubble was caused by artificially low interest rates and a massive number of sub-prime mortgage loans funded by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (quasi-government agencies, though supposedly private) which were pushed along by Barney Frank, Pelosi, and the other Democrats who in turn received massive campaign contributions. Bush and other Republicans tried to put some constraints on Freddie and Fannie, proposing reform in 2005, but were shot down by the Democrats. If Busch and Co. had succeeded, it might have pricked the real estate bubble allowing a soft landing. But it was not to be, the bubble went out of control, and the toxic assets that resulted (packages of sub-prime mortgages packaged as securities) spread throughout the financial world. Those are the facts.

Where are we now? Well, we need to let the chips fall. The pain will be great, but its better to get it over with now rather than delay it. There is no free lunch. Even a trillion dollar "stimulus plan" will not solve the problem. Eventually the piper needs to be paid.

Financial markets anticipate. They should be looking forward to what would normally be an economy that adjusts and begins to grow again. But Obama and wack-jobs like Pelosi create too much uncertainty. We don't know what they are going to do. Are they going to increase capital gains taxes (the most direct effect on the value of the stock market)? Income taxes? Corporate taxes? Even scarier, how much politics are they going to infuse into the decision making of all of these companies that are now for the most part nationalized (banks, Detroit, AIG, and probably more to come)? And the trillion dollar "fiscal stimulus" that is nothing more than an opportunistic ocean of pork Obama, Pelosi, et al, want to use to make more of the country beholden to them?

All of these things create uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty. That sounds like an oxymoron, because markets are inherently uncertain. But the reality is that the degree of uncertainty affect people's perception of risk. Increased uncertainty increases the risk premium, thus raising the discount factor applied to future earnings, which of course reduces the present day valuation of stocks. Conversely, remove some of the uncertainty listed in the previous paragraph, risk perception would go down, and the discount factor applied to future earning would be reduced, thus raising the present value of stocks.

OK, enough of that part of the economic lesson. Let's get to hyper-inflation. The uncertainty in the economy - much of it there because of the unknowns about Obama and crew and what they might do - has also caused companies to cut back investment. They are not just cutting back capital investment, but they are drastically cutting existing production capacity. Note that car manufacturers are shutting factories and idling others. Airlines are cutting back their routes. The same is happening in several industries.

Well, a certain extent of that would be normal in a recession. It's a healthy process of cleaning out the bad investments in production made during the latter stages of an expansion, which also come with efforts to improve efficiency and get back in touch with what consumers want. But the current cut backs are far beyond normal. And they are not just happening in the US, but globally and on to an unprecedented degree. Again, extreme uncertainty.

This process is combining with another fact. The Federal Reserve is printing money. In fact, it is flooding the system with new money. The ultimate result is easy to guess. Production capacity has been cut back just at a time when there is a flood of dollars. In short, there will be fewer goods available to spend this cash on. So, in essence, another bubble is created. Too much money chasing to few goods. The result: inflation. But not just a bout of higher than normal inflation. The unprecedented decline in production capacity combined with the unprecedented flood of money will cause unprecedented inflation. This will be exacerbated by the planned trillion dollar boondoggle with the misnomer "fiscal stimulus," which will distort markets and demand.

So, 2009 will be a sideways year in the stock market. 2010 might be more of the same. But come 2011, or thereabouts, the factors described about will combine to create an explosion in inflation.

Unless Obama surprises us, and I sincerely hope he does, we are in for a rough 4 years. Obama and crew will be able to get away with blaming it on Bush for 2 years. But Obama will have to own the hyper-inflation. Sarah Palin might have a future after all. In 2012.

There's more! Click to read

Obama in Wonderland

Obama in Wonderland. That is the only thing I can think of as I watch the CEOs of Detroit’s automakers beg for money from Congress. I am dumbfounded by how truly bizarre this spectacle is and what it portends for the future.

What if a year ago someone had told you that Nancy Pelosi would be in the business of reviewing the business plans of companies and deciding whether or not they would receive funding? I mean, Nancy Pelosi demanding a business plan? Harry Reid and Barney Frank as well? This is truly nuts!

It makes one wonder if perhaps the financial crisis were actually engineered to force the world of finance to go through federal gatekeepers. Such a strange world would allow the political class to make American business into an extension of political correctness. Want money? Well, first you have to have a labor union. Then you need to show us (Congress) how “green” you are. Your executives can’t make more than we (members of Congress) do. What has your business done about “social justice” lately? Prove to us that you do not have a gender pay gap. And on and on. Looks like the Soviet Politburo.

I mean, this kind of vetting of business for political motives can be the only purpose, because the idea that the political illuminati know how to evaluate a business plan is preposterous. Look at the demands, after all. While the price of oil has dropped to near $40 per barrel, Detroit is being told that they must produce more “green” cars. With the price of gasoline headed back down to $1.50 or less, does anyone seriously think that Americans will change their appetite for large and safe SUVs? If anything, Detroit should stick even closer to producing the type of cars in which they have a competitive advantage: trucks and SUVs. In a sane business environment, Detroit would be abandoning the sedan market altogether. And this is not to say that I think electric cars are a bad idea – I LOVE THE IDEA.

What about those green cars? Electric or otherwise? Well, who ever thought Detroit had a competitive advantage in producing these cars? The only way for Detroit to enjoy a market for such cars would be for Washington to protect the Big Three from competition – both domestic and foreign - in this arena. Not something unthinkable as Democrats would like to protect the UAW above all else.

In a sane business environment nobody would be looking to Detroit to produce disruptive technology. There are other companies, entrepreneurs, and boy geniuses that are better suited to usher in these exciting new products. Detroit’s competency is in producing gasoline powered large vehicles. It is also in lobbying for market restrictions that limit not only imports, but creating artificial barriers for even new domestic entrants (ever looked into what is required to get a car certified to be driven on public roads?).

I know this is hopeless, but in a sane world, our political illuminati would know something about disruptive technologies. They would have read Clayton Christensen’s “The Innovators Dilemma.” Christensen shows clearly in his landmark book that new technology that disrupts and replaces old technology, almost always at a lower cost, with increased efficiency, and greater capability, hardly ever comes from the powers-that-be in any particular industry. And trying to guess just where it will come from is a fool’s game; unless you are in venture capital, in which case you have a say in who will produce these new technologies. Of one thing you can be sure, it will not come from the oversized beasts that ruled the last era of technology.

Automobiles that are not reliant on the internal combustion engine, if the free market were allowed to prevail, would not come from Detroit and its massive bureaucracy. It would come from people and companies that understand these new technologies. Or that can dream up entirely new technologies. Did IBM invent the personal computer? Did AT&T create the Internet? Even though the answer to both of these questions is no, did true innovators that did create these incredible things cause a massive loss of unemployment in the computer and telecom sectors? No, quite the opposite. Thanks to these innovators, I am holding an iPhone in my hand that surfs the Internet wirelessly, makes incredibly cheap phones calls, takes photos, holds my entire collection of music, does all sorts of neat things that help me organize my life, and even provides a source of entertainment (in addition to music) when I’m stuck on a long, miserable flight (provided by another lousy government subsidized and unionized industry).

Unfortunately, it appears to me that the spectacle of the past few days is poised to increase, perhaps to the extreme that comparison to the Soviet Politburo is more than just rhetoric. I hope he proves me wrong, but I fear that this is the world that Obama feels he has a mandate to create. Congress and Bush appear to be doing the groundwork for him.

There's more! Click to read

Obama Bear Market Continues

The precipitous decline in the stock market since Obama was elected continues. The Dow has closed below 8000. Is 6000 the next stop?

Let's see, what might be some reasons for the decline?

Obama's promise to increase taxes, particularly taxes on dividends and capital gains.

A government under the control of Democrats in both the Executive and Legislative branches.

The Democrat's impending bail out of the UAW, which will divert resources from productive areas of the economy to one of the least productive industries in the US.

The push for unionization of large swaths of the American economy, which will raise costs, lower productivity, and lower profits.

So-called "universal health care," which will be enormously expensive while reducing incentives for people to be gainfully employed.

The upside: We don't have to worry so much about Obama "spreading the wealth around." A large part of the country's wealth is in the stock market. The Obama Bear Market is ensuring that there is very little wealth left in that pot to spread around.

So, Seattle, you got what you wanted. A "feel good" election. What's next?

There's more! Click to read

The Obama Bear Market

We are approaching a 1,000 point decline in the DOW since Obama became President-elect. It is starting to look like the modest increase in the market on Nov. 4th was probably just some market participants taking a long shot bet that McCain might somehow pull off a victory. McCain was rather convincing in those last few days when he declared that he had the "big Mo."

At what point do we need to start facing the reality that the decline in the stock market is due to Obama's vision for our economic future? When one looks closely at his plan to increase corporate taxes, increase taxes on capital gains, and increase taxes on dividends, a decline in the stock market of roughly 40% from the point where it became clear Obama had a chance to win is about the logical amount of decline one would expect. And that's what we got.

We are past the point where the prolonged and continuing decline in the equities market can be attributed to the financial crisis. That was a crisis of the "system." While the cost of bailing out banks that took on too much risk is controversial, I doubt that there is much controversy as to whether it has worked. The Federal Reserve has dramatically increased the money supply while the Treasury took steps to ensure the solvency of the balance sheets of the country's banks. Yes, there are some uncertainties still out there, such as just who has Credit Default Swap obligations hidden on or off their balance sheet, but overall, I think the market believes that the credit crisis is over. It was "historic," like Obama's election, and it is now history.

So, what is pulling the market down now? The coming "depression" that Obama so elusively alludes to? Business cycles come and go. This one may be made worse by the temporary freeze-up in the credit markets, but there is no logical reason that it should be of "depression" dimensions. If anything, given the Federal Reserve's massive increase in the money supply, we should be bouncing out into some new bubble. (Let's see, first we had tech, then real estate, what could be the next bubble? ... Perhaps industries focused on Federal contracts?).

No, the market is digesting the reality of Nov. 4 and the policy positions that Obama has clearly articulated. Higher taxes generally. Higher labor costs due to Federally backed labor unions. Increases on all of the taxes that affect risk taking. Protectionism. Carbon taxes. The intent to bankrupt the coal industry. Government involvement in a host of issues, even to the point of setting private industry's pay levels to achieve that red herring of gender pay equity.

While the 40% decline mentioned earlier reflects increased taxes on corporate profits, dividends, and capital gains, the continued long, slow decline we started November 5 reflects those things listed in the paragraph above.

Either Obama needs to appoint a few people to positions quickly that inspire confidence in the market (Treasury Secretary, for example), publicly change his tune on these issues, or both. Otherwise the DOW will likely settle below 7000 by the end of this year or early next year. And stay there for years to come.

There's more! Click to read

Barack Hugo Obama?

Were you struck that the massive and inescapable infomercial aired by Obama tonight on every network in the country was reminiscent of Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, or perhaps Big Brother, taking over the airwaves and forcing viewers to watch and listen to what MUST be heard?

I found it very creepy.

Is this the new Fairness Doctrine? Will future infomercial become state mandated airtime for Obama's big speeches?

There's more! Click to read

10 Days? Why not make it 100?

In a blatant display of political hysteria designed to make us believe that King County does not have enough money, Sims declares he will close the county down for all but "essential services."

This has to be in part an effort to get King County voters to swallow the incredibly increases in property assessments made during a year when housing values are going down, credit has dried up, and many homeowners are underwater. The fact is, Sims and his cronies have more than enough money. The problem is they spend too much.

The only good idea I've seen come out of Sims is the plan to shut down the county for 10 days. Great! Life will be better for those 10 days. Let's add a few of the so called "essential services" to the list and shut the county down for 100 days. Then, the county will run a surplus while getting out of our way. Business will boom and the tax surplus can be returned to us as a tax rebate. That tax rebate can be used to save money, pay off debt, and support local business - the real "essential" enterprises in the country.

There's more! Click to read

Euro Trash

All the more reason to like Sarah Palin. European snobs don't like her.

There's more! Click to read

Matriarchal Control and Oppression

When will the DV divas take up the issue of women that abuse children?

Probably never. But this case in Carnation is so extreme, and there have been so many others like it, that one wonders how authorities can so willingly fail to see a pattern. The pattern is that CPS has an agenda that makes it blind to abuse by women. As a subsidiary of DSHS, it's primary focus is on earning federal matching grants through enforcing child support on fathers. This, of course, necessitates removing fathers from the lives of children.

Unfortunately, this Carnation case demonstrates that even having a father around doesn't ensure the safety of a child that becomes the focal point of a woman's wrath. Clearly, the father of this girl is not without fault. But isn't it interesting that, so far, he seems to be receiving the same charges as the perpetrator of the brutal and sadistic torture of this child?

There's more! Click to read

Nationalizing Our Banking Industry

The Great 08 Bail Out has morphed into something horrific. Now the government plans to take large equity stakes in the largest banks in the country as well as investing in a thousand smaller banks. The nationalization of the country's banking industry is now underway.

Equity stakes, for course, come with Board seats. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi love the idea. Why? Because they hope Obama will win the election and socialists will have unprecedented central planning authority over the economy. There is not better way to do this that through the banking system.

Think of it: Pet issues, such as gender pay equity (which is a phony issue), can be injected directly into companies at the highest levels. Does your company want a loan? Prove that your company has gender pay equity. And that's just one of thousands of potential strings that will likely become attached to getting credit. For example, what a way to push a "green agenda." Your interest rate may be tied to your "carbon footprint."

Paulson and Bernanke may mean well. But they are kidding themselves if they think the government will pull out of these positions any time soon. This is not the same as the loan provided by the federal government to Chrysler years ago. In fact, I predict that the government may never divest, at least not in our lifetimes. It is more likely that these equity positions will grow.

It was not so long ago that we were encouraging other countries to privatize their banking industries. Our country will never be the same.

There's more! Click to read

Backlash Against the "Post Racial" Preaching

Is anyone else getting tired of the full court press by the mainstream media to shame any non-black person into voting for Barack Obama?

This is how it works: Write an article, like Danny Westnut of the Seattle Time did recently, that raises the issue of race and November's Presidential election. In the article (or cable news program) include the crudist and most raw form of racism that can be found.

What's the objective? To plant the idea in your head that if you are one of the unfortunates who does not plan to vote for Obama, you are the same as the aforementioned racists. Some like Westnut does not come out say such a thing, but counts on us to make a subconscious connection.

Obama initially lost my vote when he selected the pathological liar and feminist pandering Joe Biden as his running mate. As I watch the extent to which most of the media is without hesitation or shame promoting Obama's campaign, I am increasingly comfortable with that decision. I find that when large groups of influential people tell me I should turn left, it's usually better for me - and most average Americans - to turn right.

There's more! Click to read

Like, Um, Brilliant

The Democratic national convention began with sadness as I saw the hope I had invested in the blank slate of Obama evaporate after his choice of Joe Biden. Not even that well crafted documentary prior to Obama’s speech by the creator of An Inconvenient Truth who almost sold me on Al Gore as something more than he is (though not on global warming) could bring me back.

Of course, most guys who began that week still drawing pictures in erasable ink on the whiteboard of Obama probably continue to do so. There are not many who have bothered to research the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), of which Biden was the chief architect, and understand that it is essentially now a political crime to have a Y chromosome. But Biden is a non-starter for anyone that has.

Then, last week began with confusion. There was “wrinkly white-haired guy” with Pay-who?

I thought this guy McCain, who normally puts me to sleep, had finally made one of those crazy, unpredictable moves the press keeps claiming he is prone to. You know, Sen. “Maverick” and so on. I thought he’d done something stupid. I thought he was out of and Obama was sure to win. I was pretty sure the small number of guys like me that actually dig deep into policy issues, constitutional law, and know something about gender feminism would suffer 4 years of Biden that would only be slightly less palatable than a President Hillary Rodham.

But, as the week progressed, it started to dawn on me that the guy that normally makes me drowsy after beginning a speech with “my friends” might actually be on to something. The media that is hell bent on getting Obama elected had actually allowed some video time of Governor Palin to slip through. I don’t think they’ll make that mistake often for the next 60 or so days. Or, maybe I only saw her when surfing through Fox News, which already has hottie news anchors that don’t feel upstaged easily.

In any case, McCain seemed cleverer to me as the week progressed. The larger picture began to come into view. And I began to realize that maybe even Washington State could be in play in this presidential election.

For a Washingtonian, a female on the ticket is no big deal. It seems mandatory here to have righteous gender feminist female politicians running things. And the few men in positions of power, like Mayor Nipples, pander to the gender feminist establishment.

But, Sarah Palin is hot. Even after birthing five kids. Now, that is something unusual. And she doesn’t hate men. That is even more unusual for any guy in the state of Washington beaten down by the triumvirate of Gregoire, Cantwell, and Murray.

I mean, think about it. Gregoire is the ugly witch from the West, complete with a mole on the nose and a smile which, when she forces it through her scowl, makes you think she is imaging a brutal torture she has planned for her mangina husband later that evening. Cantwell is the ice lady. She occasionally shows up at Mariners games with good-looking guys half her age, and the women of Seattle celebrate that Cantwell is “dating” younger men in a reversal of the image that makes them so angry – the older guy with younger woman. Never mind that the guy with Cantwell is just some gay political aid that she arranged to have tag along just to create the image. I don’t know if Cantwell is a lesbian, but I’m pretty sure she’s not much into men. Then there is Patty Murray. She reminds you of the unfortunate girl in high school who always seemed angry at the boys and you always knew it was because she was just ugly and it was obvious to all that, at best, her future had a short, frumpy, bald accountant in it. She apparently does have a husband, but either she hides him in the closet, or he chooses to hide himself there whenever she comes back from inside the Beltway.

Then there is Sarah Palin. She was runner up for “Miss Alaska.” When you’re thinking of politicians and sex, it’s usually either the image of Bill Clinton pushing himself on a young woman caught up in the stardom, or some cranky old gay bashing Republican hitting on guys in a stinky public toilet.

Now, come on, admit it! How refreshing is it to look at Palin and think, “Damn, I’d like to do her.” Then you stop yourself and realize that is a bit of a ridiculous thought. Then you think, “Well, at least her husband, the guy that does do her, looks like a cool guy to hang out with. I mean, he has hot-rod snowmobiles and stuff!” She’s hot. She’s smart. Her husband seems like a cool dude. And she doesn’t hate men. And she’s in politics?!

Now a thought emerges that maybe McCain is smarter than he looks. Maybe the “dumb, out-of-touch old white guy” the media has managed to massage into our collective reticular activator (watched many commercials lately?) does not apply to McCain.

Fast forward to the Vice Presidential debates. What a pickle Biden is in. The wannabe “tough” guy, the cowardly “protector of women.” The architect of VAWA. Up against an opponent that is a woman, is hot, is anything but a “victim,” and thinks his policies are stupid. Palin is no gender feminist. What on earth is Biden going to do? What a lovely picture that makes ….

One starts to realize that the Obama crazed media has it entirely wrong. Palin was not chosen to get a slice of the supposedly disenchanted women who voted for Hillary Rodham in the primaries. The women that voted for Hillary are a thin slice of American women, all from the Democratic party. These women are the activist types, the types that see misogyny in their morning coffee, the type that despise well adjusted women like Sarah Palin, who are hot, successful, adore their man, and don’t know the meaning of the word “victim.” Hillary's sisterhood were never going to vote for a Republican no matter what, much less Palin.

No. What McCain is after are working class men and women. They don’t fall into one of the special interest groups – least not those that get the attention - which make up the Democratic party. The men will see Palin as refreshing, not just because she is hot, but because she doesn’t hate them. This is an unusual thing for these men. She will not be telling them they should feel guilty just because they are guys. The women in this group, well they have kids. And they tend to like their men. They may not be hot now, but they remember a day when they could turn heads.

Dino should be begging Palin to come campaign for him.

Goodbye Obama. It was fun for a while. Hello Palin.

There's more! Click to read